USPTO serial 76037042
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Starbucks U.S. Brands Corporation
Burlingame, CA
Starbucks U.S. Brands Corporation
Burlingame, CA
MINDEN, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Anne Matheson
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | milk and milk products, namely, sterilized milk, evaporated milk, powdered milk, condensed milk and malted milk; cream; whipping cream; dairy or non-dairy based whipped topping, liquid non-dairy coffee creamer; powdered non-dairy coffee creamer | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |