USPTO serial 76037072
FACILITY SERVICES GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FACILITY SERVICES GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Kane
JOHN J KANE SPERRY, ZODA & KANESTE DONE HIGHGATE DRTRENTON, NJ 08618Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COLLARS FOR POSITIONING IN AND AROUND OPENINGS IN WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS OF BUILDINGS FOR PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF FIRE/SMOKE/HEAT THERETHROUGH AND OTHER FIRE/SMOKE PREVENTION APPLIANCES, NAMELY, FIXTURES OF VARIOUS DIFFERENT SHAPES DESIGNED TO FILL THE AREA BETWEEN A WALL/FLOOR/CEILING PENETRATING ITEM AND THE SURROUNDING HOLE IN THE WALL, FLOOR, OR CEILING TO FACILITATE IT'S PENETRATION THERETHROUGH | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING FOR OTHERS IN THE ANALYZING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING OF A FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM WITH A DIRECTED CONCERN FOR THE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT OF FIRE AS WELL AS SMOKE AND HEAT ASSOCIATED THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |