USPTO serial 76037080
SNOWFLAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNOWFLAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Ozark, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irving Powers
IRVING POWERS SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDEL1 METROPOLITAN SQ FL 16ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, mugs, servingware, namely, serving platters, serving bowls, gravy boats, sugar bowls, cream/milk pitchers, and serving dishes for chips and dip | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | accessories, namely, butter dishes, napkin holders, candy dishes, salt and pepper shakers, spoon rest, cookie jar, utensil holder, soap dispenser, canisters, trivets; flatware, namely, knives, forks, spoons, and hostess spoons and forks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |