USPTO serial 76037211
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
Buenos Aires, AR
Other trademarks owned by Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
Buenos Aires, AR
Other trademarks owned by Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
Buenos Aires, AR
Other trademarks owned by Rock and Feller's Franchising Development S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Ritchie
WILLIAM B RITCHIE43 JACKSON STCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | bar and restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |