USPTO serial 76037540
ALLEGHENY PRO ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2846931Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALLEGHENY PRO ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Hagerstown, MD
Fairmont, WV
Fairmont, WV
Greensburg, PA
Greensburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold B. Silverman
ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURG, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF HVAC EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES; PLUMBING SERVICES; ERECTION OF UTILITY TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS; REPAIR OF CATV AND TELEPHONE LINES; INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS; UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE, NAMELY, TREE TRIMMING AND VEGETATION CONTROL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 042 | ENGINEERING DESIGN OF HVAC EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES; DESIGN OF OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES; ENERGY AUDIT SERVICES; ENERGY USAGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by The Potomac Edison Company
- Other trademarks owned by Monongahela Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by Monongahela Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by West Penn Power Company
- Other trademarks owned by West Penn Power Company
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALLEGHENY PRO ADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |