USPTO serial 76037732
AMDX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMDX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald E. Kubit
DONALD E KUBIT FOWLER WHITE BURNETT HURLEY BANICK ET ALBANK OF AMERICA TWR 17TH FL100 SE SECOND STMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | cotton for medical purposes; surgical bandages; adhesive tapes, namely, medical adhesive tapes; disinfectants for medical instruments; disinfectants for personal hygiene, namely, disinfectant handwash | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
| 010 | Surgical and medical equipment and instruments, namely, masks for use by medical personnel; surgical caps; surgical clips; surgical compresses; gowns for medical examination; medical treatment apparel; oxygen masks for medical use; medical stretchers; and medical thermometers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |