USPTO serial 76037827
EBREVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EBREVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Adelson
ROBERT A ADELSON ENGEL & SCHULTZ LLP125 HIGH ST STE 2601BOSTON, MA 02110-2724UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Foreign language communication services, namely, language translation services, document translation services, written text editing services in English and foreign languages, custom writing and composition of such items as product manuals, promotional materials, sales literature and technical documentation for others in English and foreign languages; multilingual software localization, computer consultation, computer programming in the field of global computer information networks and on-line product documentation, maintenance of computer software, and computer software design, all for others and to facilitate compatibility between English and foreign languages | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |