Drawing for PURE COPPER

USPTO serial 76037919

PURE COPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE COPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. King, Esq.

TIMOTHY J KING MYKROLIS CORPORATION129 CONCORD RDBILLERICA, MA 01821-4600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Filters for filtering chemicals introduced into copper plating for use in the microelectronics industryACTIVE
009Packaged copper anodes for use in copper plating and fluid handling systems, both for use in the microelectronics industryACTIVE
011Gas diffusers for diffusing gas into copper plating baths and liquid degassers for degassing copper plating solutions, both for use in the microelectronics industryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance