USPTO serial 76037936
VIANIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIANIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER A. SHADDOCK, II
PETER A SHADDOCK II KAUFMAN & CANOLESPO BOX 3037NORFOLK, VA 23514-3037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Self-contained and accessory communications equipment, namely computer peripherals, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers, electronic notepads, digital audio recorders, and personal digital voice and audio recorders and players, all for handheld use and connectivity to personal computers, miniature computers, personal digital assistants, audio and video equipment, photographic equipment, dictation equipment, pagers, cellular telephones and telephone lines for the purpose of data receiving, manipulating, converting, recording, reproducing, storing, organizing, editing, compressing, decompressing, encoding, decoding, playing, transmitting, transferring, and transcribing analog and digital data; computer hardware display devices, namely computer monitors and personal digital assistant displays; computers and personal digital assistants; memory devices, namely computer memory cards; data storage devices, namely blank magnetic data carriers and computer memory cards; electrical controllers; cradles for recharging and connecting the communications equipment to the foregoing; modems; cases for holding the communications equipment; adapters for connecting the communications equipment to the foregoing; microphones; headphones; transcription equipment, namely digital audio recorders and players; electronic foot pedals for controlling the foregoing transcription equipment; and instruction manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |