USPTO serial 76037994
MODERN COMPUTER FURNITURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MODERN COMPUTER FURNITURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Porcello
ONE SEAGATE, STE 1980P 0 BOX 916TOLEDO, OH 43697-0916Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture, namely, desks, computer desks, computer workstations, computer lab furniture, multimedia workstations, printer stands, computer stands, multimedia equipment carts, book carts, audiovisual carts, monitor carts, monitor shelves, keyboard trays, storage shelves and accessory shelves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |