USPTO serial 76038098
LEHIGH WATER SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3058288Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEHIGH WATER SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N.Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD O'BRIEN & FRANKEL LLP2000 MARKET STTENTH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | leasing waste water treatment and processing equipment, namely high output portable and non-portable dewatering machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |