USPTO serial 76038272
WHOLE LATTE LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHOLE LATTE LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pittsford, NY
Pittsford, NY
Pittsford, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM R ALEXANDER
WILLIAM R ALEXANDER REMINGTON GIFFORD WILLIAMS & COLICCHIO183 E MAIN ST STE 1400ROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric coffee makers for commercial and domestic use; electric coffee percolator; electric coffee pots and coffee roasting ovens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |