USPTO serial 76038427
TRANSTECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2766046Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRANSTECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liberty Corner, NJ
Liberty Corner, NJ
UNION, NJ
Union, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Davy E. Zoneraich
DAVY E ZONERAICH NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA721 ROUTE 202-206PO BOX 1018SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876-1018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL FASTENING DEVICES, NAMELY, SINGLE AND MULTI-THREADED FASTENERS; ASSEMBLY FASTENERS; LOCK NUTS; PUSH-NUTS; U-NUTS; EXTERNALLY THREADED FASTENERS; SOLID RIVETS; NUTS AND BOLTS; NUTS FOR SCREWS AND BOLTS; HOSE, WIRE, TUBE AND CABLE CLAMPS; LOCKING CLIPS; ELECTRICAL COIL TUBE CLIPS OR FASTENERS; ELECTRICAL COIL TUBE CAPS; COLD HEADED FASTENERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 1993 |
| 020 | NON-METAL HARDWARE, NAMELY, PLASTIC NUTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TransTechnology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TransTechnology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BREEZE-EASTERN CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TransTechnology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TRANSTECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |