USPTO serial 76038430
PEAKREGISTER.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEAKREGISTER.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer services, namely providing an interactive web site for the recording and the dissemination of information in the field of mountaineering | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PeakRegister.com
- Other trademarks owned by PEAKREGISTER.COM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Straub, D'Arcy W.
- Other trademarks owned by Spath, Stuart R.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PEAKREGISTER.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |