USPTO serial 76038454
LEAD FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEAD FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark M. Brandsdorfer
MARK M BRANDSDORFER LIEBERMAN & BRANDSDORFER, LLC12221 MCDONALD CHAPEL DRGAITHERSBURG, MD 20878-2252UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely an electronic database used to capture and organize company contact information, for organizing contact information for marketing purposes, for prospective contact qualification and management purposes, for moving contact along in accordance with a marketing program to insure that the contact proceeds through the indicated stages of the marketing program, for providing analysis and statistical information regarding success of marketing program and implementation information of marketing programs, and for reporting on sales and marketing prospective contacts and prospective clients | ACTIVE | Nov 23, 2001 |
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services | ACTIVE | Nov 23, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer programming services, namely web site design for others; providing an interactive database featuring automatically updating, monitoring, analysis, contact management, and tracking of perspective business contacts and prospective clients via a global computer network; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software featuring automatically updating, monitoring, analysis, contact management, and tracking of perspective business contacts and prospective clients; providing temporary use of on-line downloadable software used to capture and organize company contact information, for organizing contact information for marketing purposes, for prospective contact qualification and management purposes, for moving contact along in accordance with a marketing program to insure that the contact proceeds through the indicated stages of the marketing program, for providing analysis and statistical information regarding success of marketing program and implementation information of marketing programs, and for reporting on sales and marketing prospective contacts and prospective clients | ACTIVE | Nov 23, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lead Factory Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lead Factory Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEAD FACTORY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |