USPTO serial 76038651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DALLAS, TX
Skokie, IL
Skokie, IL
Skokie, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Diaz
Michael Diaz Diaz and Associates4100 W. El Dorado Pkwy., Suite 100 #432McKinney, TX 75070UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online and mail order retail services featuring medical, dental, and pharmaceutical goods and general merchandise in the fields of health and lifestyles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |