USPTO serial 76039296
IHARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood Shores, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and manuals supplied therewith for use in locating, accessing, capturing, retrieving, storing, indexing, manipulating, organizing, transmitting and sharing website content and other digital information for personal and business use; computer software that may be downloaded from computer networks, communications networks, and the Internet and manuals supplied therewith for use in locating, accessing, capturing, retrieving, storing, indexing, manipulating, organizing, transmitting and sharing web site content and other digital information for personal and business use | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer networks, communications networks, and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing non-downloadable computer software for use in locating, accessing, retrieving, indexing, storing, manipulating, organizing, transmitting, and sharing website content and other digital information for personal and business use; providing data integration services of computer systems and networks, mobile electronic devices, namely personal digital assistants (PDAs) and wireless telephones, and other electronic devices, namely telephone-enabled PDAs, TV set-top devices, and access appliances for use in connection with computer networks, communications networks, and the Internet; providing technology integration tools and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |