Drawing for MODEL BASEBALL

USPTO serial 76041851

MODEL BASEBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODEL BASEBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRYAN H. OPALKO

BRYAN H OPALKO BUCHANAN & INGERSOLL301 GRANT ST FL 20PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software related to baseball, namely, instructional software and screen saversACTIVE
016Printed instructional materials related to baseballACTIVE
018baseball accessories, namely, umbrellas and traveling bagsACTIVE
025baseball clothing, namely, baseball caps, jackets, warm-up suits, shirts, T-shirts, jerseys, pants, socks, sweatshirts, shoes, footwear, wrist bands, fleecewear, and rainwearACTIVE
028sporting goods, namely, baseball bases, baseball bats, baseball batting gloves, baseball batting tees, baseball gloves, baseball mitts, and practice aids related to baseball, namely, swing weights, fungo bats, pitching machines and hitting netsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance