Drawing for VERIZON WIRELESS

USPTO serial 76045052

VERIZON WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERIZON WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANIS M MANNING

JANIS M MANNING C/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSENMC HQE03H01 600 HIDDEN RDG DRVERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INCIRVING, TX 75038-3897

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035(Based on Intent to Use) Providing telephone directory informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 27, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 24, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 4, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 27, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 13, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2002REINREINSTATED
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance