USPTO serial 76045052
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANIS M MANNING
JANIS M MANNING C/O CHRISTIAN R ANDERSENMC HQE03H01 600 HIDDEN RDG DRVERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INCIRVING, TX 75038-3897| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Providing telephone directory information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |