USPTO serial 76047256
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Brody
PETER M BRODY ROPES & GRAY1301 K ST NW STE 800 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for the purpose of linking video and audio media and electronic data to global computer information network and/or a private computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | rebroadcasting of audio, video and electronic data via a global computer network and/or a private computer network; electronic transmission of messages and data via a global computer network and/or a private computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | digital conversion of analog audio and video into computer and/or electronic machine readable media | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing delivery of audio, video, and electronic data files via a global computer network and/or a private network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |