USPTO serial 76047628
HOMEPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMEPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emanuel D. Torti
EMANUEL D TORTI TORTI FLANAGAN146 MAIN STNORFOLK, MA 02056-1322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES; NAMELY, INTERACTIVE SELECTION, RETRIEVAL AND DISPLAY OF INFORMATION ON PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INCLUDING CREATING DIRECTORY LISTINGS AND DATABASES; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING OF GOODS AND SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF HOME DECORATING, HOME IMPROVEMENT, HOME DESIGN OR HOME CONSTRUCTION; GATHERING MARKET INFORMATION BY RECORDING USER INTEREST IN SPECIFIC PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, INCLUDING PRODUCT OR SERVICE ATTRIBUTES, AND MARKETING SERVICES RELATED TO PRODUCTS OR SERVICES OF OTHERS FOR DECORATING, HOME IMPROVEMENT, HOME DESIGN OR HOME CONSTRUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY IMPLEMENTING DATABASES OF COMPUTER USERS INTERESTED IN SIMILAR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES; NAMELY IMPLEMENTING DATABASES OF CONSUMERS AND PROFESSIONALS IN THE HOME DESIGN INDUSTRY, INCLUDING PROVIDING DIRECTORY LISTINGS, SHARING OF PREFERENCES AND PRODUCT SELECTION SERVICES; AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE BROCHURES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE FIELDS OF DECORATING, HOME IMPROVEMENT, HOME DESIGN OR HOME CONSTRUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |