Drawing for SWEEPING LOG

USPTO serial 76050498

SWEEPING LOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEEPING LOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald J. Weiss, Esq.

DONALD J WEISS ESQ LUBINER & WEISS26 CT STSTE 1304BROOKLYN, NY 11241

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004artificial fire logACTIVEDec 20, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 13, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 13, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 18, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jul 1, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance