USPTO serial 76050926
GENERATION D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENERATION D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Michaels
CAROL MICHAELS MCI WORLDCOM BRANDS, LLC1133 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, MESSAGES, DATA, AND DOCUMENTS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA BY MEANS OF DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA OVER VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING NETWORK CONNECTIONS AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS BY SERVER COLLOCATION; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES AND ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE OVER A DATA NETWORK USING THE IP PROTOCOL; PROVIDING PBX AND CENTREX SERVICES; PROVIDING FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |