Drawing for WARRIORS

USPTO serial 76051329

WARRIORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WARRIORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-SHIRTS and WET SUITSACTIVEFeb 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 29, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 23, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 4, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 28, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 24, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance