USPTO serial 76054223
FACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals, namely, antibiotics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SB Pharmco Puerto Rico, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SB Pharmco Puerto Rico, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LG LIFE SCIENCES, LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named FACTIVE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |