USPTO serial 76054953
EAGLETEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAGLETEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
ROBERTA S BREN4TH FL 1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, PORTABLE COMPUTERS, POCKET COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER MEMORIES, COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, INTERFACES FOR COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SCANNERS, COMPUTER MICE, COMPUTER FIRMWARE, PRINTERS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS, MONITORS, MODEMS, MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; DATA TRANSMITTING, RECEIVING AND STORING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, MEMORY STORAGE EQUIPMENTS, FACSIMILE AND/OR DATA MODEMS, CABLE MODEMS, COMPUTER TERMINAL ADAPTERS, INTEGRATED SERVICE DIGITAL NETWORK TERMINAL ADAPTERS, REMOTE ACCESS ROUTERS, REMOTE ACCESS SERVICES; PRE-RECORDED CD-ROMS, DISKETTES AND CARDS CONTAINING TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER PROGRAMS; JUKE BOX (FOR COMPUTERS); PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |