USPTO serial 76056421
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
ATLANTA, GA
PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Human Resources Solutions LLC.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Human Resources Solutions LLC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID W OPDERBECK
DAVID W OPDERBECK MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP4 GATEWAY CTR 100 MULBERRY STNEWARK, NJ 07102-4096UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, white papers, technical articles, journals, and magazines all in the field of human resources | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Human resources services, namely consulting and outsourcing services in the field of personnel management and workforce recruiting; administration of employee payroll, and employment agency services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing financial information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |