Drawing for OLIGOMODULATOR

USPTO serial 76057574

OLIGOMODULATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIGOMODULATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. MICHAEL BEAN

D. MICHAEL BEAN Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP50 Queen Street NorthSuite 1020, Box 2248Kitchener, Ontario, N2H6M2

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICALS USED IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER OR FOR STIMULATION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEMACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 13, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 19, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 12, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 15, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jul 21, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 8, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 6, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 8, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance