USPTO serial 76057580
TEXAS GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEXAS GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mikolean Morgan Longacre
MIKOLEAN MORGAN LONGACRE LONGACRE & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 16148FERNANDINA BEACH, FL 32035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Mulch and peat moss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |