USPTO serial 76058152
WIRELESS ANYWHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIRELESS ANYWHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley N. Ruben
VINCENT A SIRECI C/O TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation services in the field of satellite communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing satellite telecommunication services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information; providing multi-user access to a global computer information network, to broadcast applications, and to interactive multimedia applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of satellite telecommunication systems for the transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |