Drawing for THE WAY

USPTO serial 76061126

THE WAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin A. Clayman

MARTIN A CLAYMAN CLAYMAN, MARKOWITZ, PINNEY & BARAM, LLCTHREE REGENCY DRBLOOMFIELD, CT 06002-2331UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of martial arts and self awareness productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Nov 5, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 11, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance