USPTO serial 76061655
ULTRA DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
4261 GA Wijk en Aalburg, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Heban
LINDA HEBAN JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus, namely transformers, batteries, power supplies; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images, namely, amplifiers, video receivers, telephone receivers and audio receivers; equalizers, bass drivers, namely, apparatus intended to control and enhance bass sounds; crossovers, fader control units, namely, apparatus intended to control the balance between two amplifiers or between sets of speakers; bass and volume control units, namely,. apparatus intended for use in combination with amplifiers and loudspeakers; video and audio cassette recorders and players, CD recorders and players, mini-disc recorders and players, MP3 recorders and players, all for vehicles; loudspeakers; telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones, mobile phones, fax machines, theft alarms; and parts and accessories for the aforesaid products, namely, electrical filters, cables, plugs, battery clamps, namely, devices used to secure a battery and prevent it from moving, electrical condensers, namely an electrical device characterized by its capacity to store an electric charge, relays, connectors, electrical adapters, fuses, fuse holders, electrical distribution blocks, cable connectors, protective sheaths for electric cables, electrical connectors, namely, ring terminals, ground terminals, splices, all intended for use in relation to vehicle audio amplifiers and vehicle loudspeakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |