Drawing for CAPCELL

USPTO serial 76066823

CAPCELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPCELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biological material, namely, prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, namely, virus producing cells, antibody producing cells, cytochrome P450 producing cells and cytokine producing cells, all sold in capsules for use in agricultural, industrial and chemical processes and for use in diagnostic applications for scientific and research useACTIVE
005Unit dose capsules sold filled and containing biologically active material for pharmaceutical, and medical diagnostic applications, namely for the treatment and prevention of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, metabolic disorders, inflammatory diseases, neurological disorders, adiposity, rheumatic disorders, autoimmune diseases or hereditary diseasesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Mar 21, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 3, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 200144DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance