Drawing for EPROPOSE

USPTO serial 76066854

EPROPOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPROPOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROSE A HAGAN

ROSE A HAGAN FISH & RICHARDSON PC500 YGNACIO VALLEY RD STE 260WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for creating and maintaining online collaborative networks; hosting web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; technical consultation in the field of computer software and hardware; computer software design for others; installation of computer software; updating of computer software for others; maintenance of computer software; and technical supervision in the field of creating and maintaining automated collaborative business relationshipsACTIVEMay 14, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance