USPTO serial 76066910
SDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COREA, ANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VINCENT N PALLADINO
VINCENT N PALLADINO FISH & NEAVE1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | application service provider services, namely, (1) providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to provide a proprietary internet portal platform providing private extranet, email, file, document management, message, accounting, billing, budgeting, wireless, personal data assistant synchronization, business intelligence, enterprise reporting, customer support, data transfer and workgroup services with open source extensible mark-up language, application programming interfaces for dynamic hosting, namely, aggregating and integrating other third party business services, business internet software and services physically hosted on disparate servers throughout the internet; (2) providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to provide fully integrated individual and collaborative workgroup internet applications, namely, calendar management, scheduling, contact management, and task lists; (3) providing temporary use of non-downloadable software and integrated business services for collaborative business processes and (4) providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications and integrated business services tailored to specific vertical markets, namely, collaborative business processes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |