USPTO serial 76069122
FLYING DUTCHMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3023962Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLYING DUTCHMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO THE NETHERLANDS B.V.
AMSTELVEEN 1181 ZA, NL
Other trademarks owned by BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO THE NETHERLANDS B.V.
9726 BB, Groningen, NL
9726 BB, Groningen, NL
9726 BB, Groningen, NL
ASSENS, DK
ASSENS, DK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | pipe tobacco | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 13, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO THE NETHERLANDS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Theodorus Niemeyer B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Theodorus Niemeyer B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Theodorus Niemeyer B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLIK TOBACCO COMPANY A/S
- Other trademarks owned by ORLIK TOBACCO COMPANY A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named FLYING DUTCHMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |