USPTO serial 76069338
TINKERBELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TINKERBELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1017 CG Amsterdam, NL
1017 CG Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. McGovern, Esq.
Jeffrey B. McGovern720 South Powerline RoadSuuite DDeerfield Beach, FL 33442Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COMBINATION PILLOW AND PAJAMA BAG, CUSHIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |