USPTO serial 76069635
TUBE MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUBE MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PORTABLE PIPE AND TUBE END SHAPING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |