USPTO serial 76070112
FETISH CLOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2652841Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- GLEASON, THOMAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FETISH CLOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
NEW YORK, NY
SOUTH RIVER, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely sweatshirts, long sleeve t-shirts, short sleeve t-shirts, belts, jerseys, sweat pants, and motorcycle apparel, namely, pants, jackets, vests, boots, and gloves constructed for motorcycle riding | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MX Clothing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MX Clothing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FETISH TRADEMARK COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLONDIE AND ME, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FETISH CLOTHING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |