USPTO serial 76070127
VITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Keating
EDWARD M KEATING COOK, ALEX, MCFARRON, MANZO, CUMMINGS &200 W ADAMS ST STE 2850CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Overcoats, suits, undergarments, knit headbands, knit blouses, knit mittens, knit scarfs, knit shirts, knit skirts, knit sweaters and knit vests, shirts, polo shirts, blue jeans and scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | cloth soft sculpture toys, teddy bears, dolls, toys, set toys, wooden toys, plastic toys, paper toys, metal toys and costume masks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, ice cream and sandwiches | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juice | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail stores featuring clothing, foot wear, head wear, bags, wallets, fashion accessories, toys, audio and video apparatus, timepieces, telephones, bedding linens, stationery, jewelry, books, lamps, furniture, toiletries, kitchen utensils and containers, combs and brushes, soap dispensers, electronic apparatus and retail card sales and retail delicatessen services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | cafe services, cafeteria services, coffee shop services, cocktail lounge services, bar and snack bar services, canteen services, catering services, restaurant services, self service restaurant services, fast food restaurant services, carry-out or take away fast food services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Skytex Industrial Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VITO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |