USPTO serial 76071002
KREHLE CURVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KREHLE CURVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-86899 LANDSBERG AM LECH, DE
D-86899 LANDSBERG AM LECH, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys in bulk, sheet, rod, bar and/or billet form; metallic building materials, namely, metal roof systems and their components consisting primarily of roofing panels, hips and tiles; portable metal buildings; metal components for locks, namely, cylinders, keys, and structural parts therefor; other metallic products, namely, window canopies, wall, roofing, fence, door and ceiling panels, awnings, radius copings and facades, dormer windows and gables, and wall caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Plumbing services, roofing installation and repair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |