USPTO serial 76071589
PREFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Lezdey
JOHN LEZDEY JOHN LEZDEY & ASSOCIATES4625 E BAY DR STE 302CLEARWATER, FL 33764UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Development and dissemination of educational material, namely, providing courses of instruction at the primary, secondary, and college level in the field of multimedia and interactive media for the needs of the music business | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Intellectual property consultation and licensing, namely within the music business; graphical art design; new product design for others for the needs of the music business; Legal services, namely negotiation and settlement of commercial transactions for third parties, namely between the information technology business and the music business and within the music business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |