USPTO serial 76071772
PLANT2SQL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANT2SQL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New South Wales, 2073, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer application software for factory automation, process control, process monitoring, and machine testing; CD-ROMs featuring instructional material for the use of factory automation and process control software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | instructional manuals, brochures and newsletters in the field of factory automation, process control, process monitoring, and machine testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |