Drawing for PEE-WEE HERMAN

USPTO serial 76072704

PEE-WEE HERMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEE-WEE HERMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely hats, shirts, t-shirts, socks and pajamasACTIVE—
028Dolls and playsets for dollsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 21, 2008WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2008WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 28, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance