Drawing for EMERGIA

USPTO serial 76073222

EMERGIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMERGIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRODUCTION OF SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES; TECHNICAL RESEARCH AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 19, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance