USPTO serial 76073224
EMERGIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3226288Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERGIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28013 Madrid, ES
28013 Madrid, ES
28013 Madrid, ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION, REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES, NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC RECEPTORS, BLANK INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CARDS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMITTING, AND REPRODUCING SOUND AND IMAGES IN MOBILE TELEPHONE SERVICE, VIDEO RECORDERS, BLANK AUDIO TAPES; BLANK MAGNETIC CODED CARDS, OPTIC DISCS AND BLANK RECORDING DISCS; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES AND MECHANISMS FOR COIN OPERATED APPARATUS, NAMELY, CARD READERS, DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS; COMPUTERS, COMPUTER TELEPHONY SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH FACILITATES SEARCHING FOR AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION ACROSS GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, AND FOR THE EXECUTION OF BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS USING GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER AND TELEVISION TERMINALS; KEYBOARDS AND MOUSES; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM FOR COMPUTER TELEPHONY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC AND TELEPHONY APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF MESSAGES, NAMELY, FIXED TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE SWITCHBOARDS, TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES, RADIOTELEPHONES, FAX MACHINES; TELEPHONIC AND TELEGRAPHIC CABLES, FIBRE OPTIC CABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |