USPTO serial 76073482
SHIP IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIP IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH A SHARKIN ESQ
KEITH A SHARKIN ESQ KING & SPAULDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING MERCHANTS, BUSINESSES, CONSUMERS AND OTHER USERS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WITH INFORMATION PERTAINING TO MAILING, SHIPPING, INVENTORY AND TRACKING OF MERCHANDISE; ON-LINE SERVICES, NAMELY, CONVERTING CUSTOMER-PROVIDED INFORMATION INTO LABELS FOR USE BY THIRD PARTY CARRIERS | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |