Drawing for PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 76073733

PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN N. SIEGER

LOOPSTRA NIXON LLP135 QUEENS PLATE DR STE 600TORONTO, ON M9W 6V7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Contact lensesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 12, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance