USPTO serial 76074508
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing audio, audiovisual and multimedia programs in the nature of seminars, conferences, virtual conferences, virtual learning networks, e-learning, self-help instruction, professional development, in-flight audio, audio books, textbooks, classroom training, supplemental curriculum materials; entertainment services, namely, providing audio, audiovisual and multimedia programs in the nature of news shows, museums, broadcast and cable programming and infotainment; all featuring information in the fields of business travel, countries and cultures via a variety of media, namely, the global computer network, intranet and extranet networks, commercial online networks, television, cable television, web television, satellite, hotel television, airport kiosks, in-flight video, handheld computing devices, telephone, mobile telephone, wireless information services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |