USPTO serial 76074581
VAPORTEK ... THE LEADER IN AIR TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2665190Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VAPORTEK ... THE LEADER IN AIR TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah M. H. Brindley
Sarah M. H. Brindley Quarles & Brady LLP411 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESuite 2040MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Liquid chemical composition containing enzymes for digesting odor causing organic materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 003 | multi-purpose cleaning preparations for industrial, commercial, institutional and domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 005 | Chemical preparations, namely, carpet and room deodorizers; air and fabric odor neutralizers; air deodorizers for the absorption of odors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 011 | Electric air deodorizers and air purifying units for industrial, commercial, institutional, and domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vaportek, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vaportek, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vaportek, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VAPORTEK ... THE LEADER IN AIR TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |